Auto Fluff Recycling

January 19, 2009 -- Filed under My impact by Andrew Macdonald

I’m not thinking about glossy ads or the advertorial nature of auto reviews here, but rather the increasing volume of glass, plastic, foam, textiles and rubber built into today’s automobile. Thinking about all of this stuff in new cars came out of a conversation over the holiday about the “old days” while we were tinkering with an “old” restored 1975 Volkswagen 914. Most folks don’t remember these cars, so if you need a reminder, here’s a picture of one.


Back to the car stuff. While poking around the 914, someone said something like, “for a really small car it appears to be manufactured with a high percentage of steel. What does it weigh?” (For example, the dash is solid steel.) The car has a very small footprint, and weighs in wet at approximately 2,000 lbs or 908 kg, which means that, like most vehicles of this vintage, it required large quantities of ferrous and non-ferrous metals.

We opened the garage door to look at the “new” cars a few of the guys had parked outside. The contrast from the old to the new was remarkable. What became very obvious was the volume of NON metals used in the manufacture of these modern automobiles. So, when these vehicles come to the end of there useful life, what will happen to all of the glass, plastic, foam, trim, switches and electronics?

When I Googled “automobile shredder” I found this really cool 30-second video of a vehicle being consumed by a massive 4,000 horsepower machine. When I added the word residue to the search I came up with “auto fluff,” a term coined in this article from Autorecycler. Auto fluff now comprises 20-25% of a vehicle’s weight. And due to the complexity of material recyclability, this “waste” is destined to become landfill.

In Canada, we crush (recycle) about 700,000 vehicles each year. The fluff is then processed by screening, grinding or shredding the material. If we know this “shredder residue” represents 25% of vehicle volume, we in Canada are dumping the equivalent of 175,000 vehicles into landfills each year. That’s a lot of blue boxes!

Here’s the problem. In the future, vehicles will become much lighter, in part through the use of more non-ferrous materials. As a result, shredder residue will continue to increase as a waste stream, and will become a serious raw material resource issue for every nation with a personal automobile habit.

Here is the exciting part: our friends in Europe are well on the road to finding a solution for the end-of-life residue challenge. In fact, end-of-life management, sometimes called lifecycle analysis, is scheduled to take effect in 2015.
Volkswagen AG, in partnership with SiCon Corporation, has developed an auto recycling process that has become the industrial standard for Europe.

The process converts more than 95% of automobile shredder residue into recycled, usable products. These products have a market value which supports the business case, while ensuring that certain raw materials (like palladium from catalytic converters) are returned to manufacturers (VW) for reuse, thus creating an effective raw material lifecycle system. The technology, called the “VW-SiCon Process” intelligently combines various tried and tested treatment stages.

If I apply all of this through the eyes of my 10-year-old, the numbers are staggering: we have thrown away 1.7 million vehicles since 1999. I wonder how many we will send to the landfill the year she turns 20. With the Volkswagen AG auto recycling process applied here in Canada, we have the potential to move auto material recovery from 75% to more than 95%, thus preventing 140,000 vehicles from entering landfill sites each year.

Maybe we can find someone at the Automotive Recyclers of Canada association to help us understand the direction of the Canadian industry. I will send a note!




6 Comments

Comments

Ok, I’ll let you off this time, but contrary to Porsche-philes’ complaints the 914 was Porsche and not a VW.
Let’s look at your 914. Does it have power windows, locka and all the other bloating options? No? Really? How about air conditioning? (As crazy as that sounds most convertibles today are sold with ac.) No? Hard to believe. What about front, side and curtain air bags? No? Can’t believe it. Surely your 914 has 15-20 kilos of sound deadening material to lower the decibel level to the point where you can listen to the opera on you satelite radio? No? What!? It won’t run if it doesn’t have a engine control module, body control module, drivetrain control module and braking control module, with their accompanying wiring harnesses and hundreds of meters of wire? No? Boy you sure have a dinosaur on your hands. It is light, simple and fun to drive. Resource freindly to build and gets OK mileage. Junk it and buy something NEW!
Lets get back to the three R’s. The first one is very pertinent to this situation. REDUCE – If we are truly concerned about our cars impact on the environment, shouldn’t we be looking at simple vehicles that provide safe and economical transportation rather than vehicles that have leather seats, power everything and all the resulting “FLUFF” that foes with them? Sure we should, but like most “environmentally conscious people I meet, they like that stuff. It might get hot in their car inthe summer. They need to plug in their iPod and for heavens sake, having to manually roll down your window at a drive thru ATM is beyond the realm of acceptability. Plus new leather has that certain smell.
Secondly, if we used cars to the end of their lifecycle rather than trade them in when we grow tired of them, we can cut down this waste by at least 50%. Cars are traded in long before their useful days are up and the environmental cost of maintaining a vehicle is far less than producing a new one. But we have “environmental people” that trade in three year old Jetta TDI’s for fully loaded Toyota Camry Hybrids don’t we. They have to do their part right. Right
So VW et al, why not stop this problem at the source. Don’t put this “FLUFF” in your cars. Oh, I forgot, all this “FLUFF” is highly profitable for you. Why take out “FLUFF” that we will buy when you guys can make really, really high margins on it? Oh, I don’t know… cause it’s the right thing to do if you really want to help the environment! Save your money on your recycling efforts and give it to the homeless.
Keep your 914 and run it forever. I wish I had done the same with my Fiat X1/9. There will never be cars like them in the future. They were literally cars ahead of their time.


That was an entertaining read! One more point on simplicity; the washer fluid in the 914 is pumped with air from the inflated spare tire in the boot. There may be a safety issue there…
I suspect there are significant numbers within the “car enthusiast” community who appreciate the simplicity and art form of an era past. These folks may not view there interest in what really is design efficiency as sustainable but at its roots that’s exactly what it is. And you are correct, most of us want every creature comfort and safety feature available.
What has changed are the questions being asked in the engineering and manufacturing operations of all the major global corporations; Over half the Fortune 500 have executive position sustainability positions. These groups are asking; “How do we continually reduce the impact of our products and operations”?
In the case of the auto industry President Obama nudged the car companies further down this road today telling the EPA to reopen the application for a California tailpipe emissions waiver. 17 states and 4 provinces in Canada will immediately follow suit. Could this be the tipping point towards what Volkswagen calls sustainable mobility?


to Saur kraut

about that sentence :
>>It won’t run if it doesn’t have a engine control module, body control module, drivetrain control module and braking control module, with their accompanying wiring harnesses and hundreds of meters of wire?<<

While it’s right that newer cars (90′s and up) have a lot of ECUs (simple computers that controls the systems), this setup is actually lighter and much simpler than the traditionnal setup (wires and relays).

As an example, in an older four door car with electric window lifts, the left front door harness used to have up to 40 wires (4 window lifts switches, door lock switch, rear view mirror, memory for seat position, etc).

Now, such a harness coulb be as simple as 4 wires and a door control module : 2 wires for signal, and 2 wires for 12V power. That’s called “multiplexing” and this technology is present everywhere now. It’s the same technology that allow you to type your post on your computer.

Innovation is not always headed toward the wrong way. But I agree with you, lighter is better in terms of fuel economy and global impact.


I have yet to see car with four wires in its doors run through my shop. Lets take a late 80′s Volvo and compare it with any car built in the last ten years. The simple switches for the windows wire ball/rocker switches. Easy to repair and minimanlist interms of materials used. The whole assembly took ten wires. Modern cars have the switches in a bundle. That cannot be repair an due to the circuit boards inside are not easily recycled. Unless you ship the whole lot to the developing world where the burn everything on the beach and collect the metal residue.
You say that newer technology of multiplexing “could” reduce this burden to four wires. Yes it could, but I haven’t seen it yet. And from a recycling stand point wires are easier to recycle that microprocessors and circuit boards.
My point is simple – In environmental terms less is definitely more. A truly green vehicle will have fewer options.


Good tips you put out there about Fellowes-shredder products and brands. Thanks! Now that I got to know more about, I am now joining the great global competition. Wish me luck!


The current A8 has been soldiering on since 2003 and a full model change is quite timely with German luxo-marque’s typical 7 year model lifecycles. The S-Class received a mid-life facelift this year and Munich’s offering got an all-new model change last year, with the flagship just announced, chock full of 12 cylinders, 2 turbochargers and 8 forward ratios.


Create a profile




...or identify yourself with